This paper was prepared for presentation at the 2010 SPE Shale Gas Production Conference held in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 23 - 25 February 2010.
Abstract
Long-term shale gas well performance characteristics are generally not well understood. The ultra-low permeability of shale ensures the continuing presence of pressure transient effects
during well production. This makes production forecasting a difficult and non-unique exercise. Conventional methods have proven to be too pessimistic, in many cases, because they assume
a depletion-dominated system. Recently, more suitable forecasting methods have been developed that account for long-term transient effects. These methods incorporate a transient model
(usually linear flow) which transitions into a conventional boundary-dominated flow model after a prescribed time or upon achieving a certain region of investigation. The underlying
concept assumes that once a transition to boundary-dominated flow is observed, depletion will dominate the production going forward. Although this methodology has been successfully
applied for a variety of tight gas reservoirs, it may not be the right model for fractured shale gas (and some conventional tight gas) reservoirs. Fractured shale gas reservoirs get
their productivity from the stimulated reservoir volume (SRV), which may be quite limited in areal extent but is surrounded by a low-permeability reservoir (matrix). Thus, the mechanism
for long-term production includes a late-time transition from depletion of the SRV, back to infinite acting (linear or pseudo-radial) flow. This “return” to infinite acting flow may or
may not provide contribution to recoverable reserves within a practical time-frame, but it should be considered nonetheless.
In this paper we present a straight forward methodology for determining the major well performance characteristics of fractured horizontal shale gas wells, considering the impact of
uncertainty and non-uniqueness. The focus will be on determining the dominant flow regimes and bulk properties from the data, and then defining a suitable, simple reservoir model for
production forecasting, using practical experience and all available information. Field examples from the Barnett, Marcellus, and Haynesville shales are included.
Note
A full text version of this paper is available on the Society of Petroleum Engineers web site. Remember to write down the paper's author(s), title and published date as this information will be needed to search for this paper in the SPE archives.